The Covenant with Death Part 2

The “The Covenant with Death” relationship between Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and the American College of Ob-Gyn (ACOG).

The “The Covenant with Death” relationship between Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and the American College of Obstetricians & Gynecologists (ACOG).

Part 2

Isaiah 28: 15-18, NIV

You boast, “We have entered into a covenant with death, with the realm of the dead we have made an agreement. When an overwhelming scourge sweeps by, it cannot touch us, for we have made a lie our refuge and falsehood our hiding place.” So this is what the Sovereign Lord says: “See, I lay a stone in Zion, a tested stone, a precious cornerstone for a sure foundation; the one who relies on it will never be stricken with panic.  I will make justice the measuring line and righteousness the plumb line; hail will sweep away your refuge, the lie, and water will overflow your hiding place. Your covenant with death will be annulled; your agreement with the realm of the dead will not stand. When the overwhelming scourge sweeps by, you will be beaten down by it.

In Part 1 of this series, we reviewed the entanglement of our governmental agencies, HHS and CDC with ACOG through Our Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) that Maggie Thorp JD MACP and I obtained. You can review Part 1 here.

In Part 2 we continue into revelation and implications of an extremely concerning relationship between the HHS, CDC, and ACOG. This “covenant with death” is likely a “fingerprint” of the same contracts that all the other recipients of the $13 Billion given out by our government HHS, CDC through their newly formed “COVID-19 Community Corps” (CCC) in early 2021. Former Deputy Secretary of HHS appears to be “credited” with this program. CCC is most accurately described as PsyOps - 5^th generation warfare campaign designed to promote a fraudulent narrative that these experimental genetic therapy masqueraded as a gene therapy were safe, effective and necessary in pregnancy.

CCC was launched immediately after the damning Pfizer 5.3.6 post-marketing experience was completed on February 28, 2021. HHS/CDC/CCC attempted to conceal this data that documented it to be the deadliest drug ever rolled out to the public. There were 1,223 dead in 10 weeks (page 7) and extraordinarily ominous pregnancy outcomes (page 12) including an 81% miscarriage rate, a 5-fold increase in stillbirths, a 7.9-fold increase in neonatal deaths and breastfeeding complications in 14.7% of the newborns.[1] Figures 1 and 2 below depict a picture of pages 7, and 12.

Figure 1 demonstrates page 7 of the Pfizer 5.3.6 post-marketing experience available on February 28, 2021 documenting that the Pfizer COVID-19 “vaccine” was the deadliest drug ever rolled out to the public.

Figure 2 demonstrates page 12 of the Pfizer 5.3.6 post-marketing experience available on February 28, 2021 documenting that the Pfizer COVID-19 “vaccine” was the most dangerous, deadly drug ever rolled in pregnancy women.

HHS and COVID-19 Community Corps: Follow the “Communication Science”

Essential to its strategy, HHS sought to identify trusted community leaders, enlist them to join its COVID-19 Community Corps (CCC), and then utilize these “trusted sources” to convince those around them to take the COVID-19 “vaccines.”[2] According to a December 23, 2020 article published by CBS News, HHS ran “focus groups” to fine-tune its pro-“vaccine” message for what then HHS Deputy Assistant Sec. Weber referred to as “the moveable middle.”[3] As then, Deputy Assistant Secretary Weber also reportedly noted, “Communication science says you need a messenger who resonates as trusted.”[4]

The focus was on finding people with not just local, but also uniquely interpersonal influence.  As Harvard public health professor Jay Winsten,[5] who has advised previous administrations, reportedly explained to CBS News in its December 2020 article, “You want to go for the low-hanging fruit, those that are easiest to pick and harvest.”[6] Noting that the focus should be on finding locally influential people to push the vaccines, Winsten added, “People trust their own doctors, their own nurses, their own pastors, their own social networks. That’s very, very different from a distant figure.”[7]

Indeed, the effort was very different from using a distant figure.

The marketing methods utilized by HHS to push the COVID-19 “vaccines” – including the creation of COVID-19 Community Corps – were so vastly different from any other HHS propaganda effort that an article was published in the Journal of Health Communication in April of 2022 detailing the process.[8] Featuring now-retired HHS Deputy Assistant Sec. Mark Weber as lead author, the article confirms that HHS did, in fact, target interpersonal relationships.[9]

As Weber and his co-authors explain: “Market research impacted every element of the Campaign from the beginning – from overall strategy to early paid advertising, social media postings, and other mass communication strategies. The need for interpersonal interactions with physicians, ministers, family, and community members was clear from the initial market research conducted in the fall of 2020. While the first phase of the Campaign initially focused on mass media messages, it shifted to more of a trusted messenger, and community orientation, with outreach focused at the community level.”[10]

Weber’s and his colleagues’ “vaccine” marketing efforts were so successful that, after retiring from HHS, Weber apparently formed his own private company aimed at “Achieving bold goals at the Federal Level”[11] – in typical revolving door fashion, identical to that of the infamous Scott Gottlieb Commissioner of the FDA who suddenly resigns and is rewarded with a lucrative position as a Board of Directors with Pfizer.[12]

According to Weber and his co-authors, the HHS campaign to push the COVID-19 “vaccines” entered its third phase in 2022 and has evolved into a highly targeted approach using both paid and “earned” media strategies.

As explained in the article, the HHS campaign: “Focuses more on precision marketing to identify subgroups with vaccine hesitancy, working directly with communities and using trusted messengers in those communities to deliver messages without the Federal government being directly involved (even though the information may come from a Federal source).”[13]

Notably, the article neglects to fully explain – or even recognize – that what HHS engaged in is both deceptive and unethical. This is because HHS used persons and methods targeting trust within interpersonal relationships to push messages that the “vaccines” were safe and effective – but often, government involvement behind the messaging was not fully disclosed. In some instances, as reported by ABC News in a page now removed from the internet, government organizations recruited and paid influential individuals to offer opinions about the safety and/or efficacy of the “vaccines” – as if these were their own independent opinions.[14]

See Part 3 in our upcoming Substack.

James A Thorp, MD

---

[1]  5.3.6 CUMULATIVE ANALYSIS OF POST-AUTHORIZATION ADVERSE EVENT REPORTS OF PF-07302048 (BNT162B2) RECEIVED THROUGH 28-FEB-2021.  file:///C:/Users/James%20Thorp%20MD/Dropbox/PC/Downloads/5.3.6-postmarketing-experience%20(3).pdf

[2]  U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). 2021. “U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Launches Nationwide Network of Trusted Voices to Encourage Vaccination in Next Phase of COVID-19 Public Education Campaign.” (Screen Snapshot captured on April 1, 2021, at 22:51:02, by Internet Archive Wayback Machine. Accessed May 1, 2023). https://web.archive.org/web/20210401225102/https://www.hhs.gov/about/news/2021/04/01/hhs-launches-nationwide-network-trusted-voices-encourage-vaccination-next-phase-covid-19-public-education-campaign.html.

[3]  Kates, Graham. “Inside the $250 Million Effort to Convince Americans the Coronavirus Vaccines are Safe.” CBS News, December 23, 2020. Accessed May 2, 2023. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/covid-vaccine-safety-250-million-dollar-marketing-campaign/.

[4]  IBID footnote 3

[5]  Harvard T.H. Chan: School of Public Health. 2023. “Jay A. Winsten, Ph.D.” Accessed May 6, 2023. https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/jay-winsten/.

[6]  IBID footnote 3

[7]  IBID footnote 3

[8]  Mark A. Weber, Thomas E. Backer & April Brubach. “Creating the HHS COVID-19 Public Education Media Campaign: Applying Systems Change Learnings.” April 25, 2022. Journal of Health Communication, 27:3, 201-207, DOI: 10.1080/10810730.2022.2067272.

[9]  IBID footnote 8

[10]  IBID footnote 8

[11]  LinkedIn. 2023. “Mark Weber (He/Him): “Your success is my success!” Accessed May 1, 2023. https://www.linkedin.com/in/mark-weber 595918a/.

[12]  Trust issues deepen as yet another FDA commissioner joins the pharmaceutical industry. https://qz.com/1656529/yet-another-fda-commissioner-joins-the-pharmaceutical-industry

[13]   Mark A. Weber, Thomas E. Backer & April Brubach. “Creating the HHS COVID-19 Public Education Media Campaign: Applying Systems Change Learnings.” April 25, 2022. Journal of Health Communication, 27:3, 201-207, DOI: 10.1080/10810730.2022.2067272 (emphasis added).

[14]   Anderson, James. “US Turns to Social Media Influencers to Boost Vaccination Rates.” ABC News, August 21, 2021. (Screen Snapshot captured on August 31, 2021, at 00:09:25, by Internet Archive Wayback Machine. Accessed May 5, 2023). https://web.archive.org/web/20210831000925/https://abcnews.go.com/Lifestyle/wireStory/us-turns-social-media-influencers-boost-vaccine-rates-79373529.