The Covenant with Death Part 3
The “The Covenant with Death” relationship between Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and the American College of Ob-GYN (ACOG)
Part 3
Isaiah 28: 15-18, NIV
You boast, “We have entered into a covenant with death, with the realm of the dead we have made an agreement. When an overwhelming scourge sweeps by, it cannot touch us, for we have made a lie our refuge and falsehood our hiding place.” So this is what the Sovereign Lord says: “See, I lay a stone in Zion, a tested stone, a precious cornerstone for a sure foundation; the one who relies on it will never be stricken with panic. I will make justice the measuring line and righteousness the plumb line; hail will sweep away your refuge, the lie, and water will overflow your hiding place. Your covenant with death will be annulled; your agreement with the realm of the dead will not stand. When the overwhelming scourge sweeps by, you will be beaten down by it.
In Part 1 and Part 2 of this series, we reviewed the entanglement of our governmental agencies, HHS and CDC with ACOG through Our Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) that Maggie Thorp JD MACP and I obtained.
Near-Perfect Trojan Horses? “Communication Science” Means Access and Influence
Regarding the issue of “trust,” – a pregnant patient’s relationship with her ob-gyn is arguably one of the most intimate and sacred physician-patient relationships in all of medicine. This is not without reason – as one patient and writer notes, “They’re right next to you for the most momentous occasion of your life.”[1] Pregnant mothers trust their ob-gyn doctor with the most intimate and sensitive information about their own bodies, their sex lives, and, if pregnant, about the new life growing inside of them. Their ob-gyn is one of the first persons to actually see a mother’s newborn baby, whether reading prenatal images during the pregnancy or during the birthing and delivery process. Some individuals have even reported the development of a non-romantic affection for their ob-gyn that rivals that of the baby’s father in some ways, due to the “complete vulnerability” many women reportedly experience with their gynecological and pregnancy specialists.[2] In sum, government capture of ACOG would provide access to and influence over near-perfect “trojan horses” to market the CDC’s pro-vaccine message.
The Ob-Gyn “Trojan Horse”
As for ob-gyn doctors, ACOG’s 60,000 members span two continents, providing tremendous opportunity for access to those who could potentially become “trusted messengers.” In addition, ACOG’s 60,000+ members steward one of the most trusted and intimate physician-patient relationships in all of medicine, thus providing tremendous opportunity for wielding influence over the vaccine-hesitant.
The Patient “Trojan Horse”
As for ob-gyn patients, women have been referred to as “A Brand’s Powerhouse.”[3] This is not without good reason: marketing studies have shown that women reportedly make a full 90% of all healthcare decisions about their household.[4] Convincing women to take the COVID-19 shots was almost a guarantee that they would become pro-COVID-19 “vaccine” messengers within their own families.
Moreover, if the COVID-19 “vaccines” were considered safe enough to administer to pregnant patients (and thereby trans-placentally to their unborn babies) – certainly they were safe enough for everyone. If HHS and CDC could pull off government capture of ACOG, and convince its ob-gyn members to push the shots on their patients, this would be a bonanza for reaching the “vaccine” hesitant – what HHS Deputy Assistant Sec. Mark Weber referred to as the “moveable middle.”[5]
Cooperative Agreements – Government Capture of ACOG
On February 1, 2021, ACOG was awarded the first of what would be three HHS/CDC “Cooperative Agreement” grants made during the pandemic, in which ACOG would receive over $11 million in grant money over coming years.[6] But there was a catch. As the name of the grants indicates – documents obtained in a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request show that ACOG’s receipt of COVID-19 grant money was conditioned on ACOG yielding substantial control over the projects which were to be funded by the grants to the CDC.[7] Receipt of the grant money was also contingent on ACOG’s full compliance with CDC guidance on COVID-19 infection and control.[8]
And on April 23, 2021, the CDC’s guidance on COVID-19 “vaccination” for pregnant individuals was made crystal clear. On that day, CDC Director Dr. Rochelle Walensky announced at a White House COVID-19 briefing that the CDC was now recommending all pregnant individuals should receive the COVID-19 “vaccine.”[9]
Perhaps unsurprisingly, following the lead of the CDC, on July 30, 2021, ACOG, along with the Society for Maternal Fetal Medicine (SMFM), recklessly began endorsing COVID-19 vaccination in pregnancy,[10] even though the clinical trials failed to include pregnant women (Figure 1).
Figure 1 depicts the predetermined, “fait accompli” Timeline for the rollout of the COVID-19 “vaccines” in pregnancy. There was NEVER any safety data, only blaring sirens and flashing redlights screaming danger signals from the Pfizer 5.3.6 post marketing experience collected from December 14, 2020 to February 28, 2021 as reviewed in Part 2 of this series.[11]
Figure 1 shows the timeline for the predetermined, “fait accompli” rollout of the COVID-19 vaccines in pregnancy.
See Part 4 in our upcoming Substack where we continue this series on the Covenant with Death.
James A Thorp, MD
[1] Pickworth, Carin. “I’m in Love with my Obstetrician, and I’m not Alone.” News.com.au. KidSpot, April 5, 2018. Accessed May 2, 2023. https://www.kidspot.com.au/pregnancy/labour/im-in-love-with-my-obstetrician-and-im-not-alone/news-story/1fc5007077f517444c29fe53acecce56.
[2] IBID footnote 1
[3] WCA_FemalePowerhouse_Infographic_2018.pdf. https://womenschoiceaward.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/WCA_FemalePowerhouse_Infographic_2018.pdf.
[4] IBID footnote 3
[5] Kates, Graham. “Inside the $250 Million Effort to Convince Americans the Coronavirus Vaccines are Safe.” CBS News, December 23, 2020. Accessed May 2, 2023. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/covid-vaccine-safety-250-million-dollar-marketing-campaign/.
[6] USASPENDING.gov. 2023. “Spending by Prime Award.” Accessed May 3, 2023. https://www.usaspending.gov/search/?hash=2b9bbf7349e6c520a55164cbe34c6321.
[7] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). 2023. Documents responsive to FOIA Request. 2023. https://centersfordiseasecontrol.sharefile.com/d-sa6cdb04fbfef4f579490cc942fe74945 . Accessed May 3, 2023. See pp. 569-575. Specifically, p. 573 states in connection with a COVID-19 related grant awarded to ACOG on July 13, 2022:
Substantial Involvement by CDC: This is a cooperative agreement and CDC will have substantial programmatic involvement after the award is made. Substantial involvement is in addition to all post award monitoring, technical assistance, and performance reviews undertaken in the normal course of stewardship of federal funds (Emphasis retained).
[8] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). 2023. Accessed May 3, 2022. Documents responsive to FOIA Request can be accessed at https://centersfordiseasecontrol.sharefile.com/d-sa6cdb04fbfef4f579490cc942fe74945.
[9] Coleman, Justine. “CDC Recommends Pregnant People Get COVID-19 Vaccine.” The Hill, April 23, 2021. Accessed May 2, 2023. https://thehill.com/policy/healthcare/549965-cdc-declares-it-recommends-pregnant-people-get-covid-19-vaccine/.
[10] The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG). 2023. “ACOG and SMFM Recommend COVID-19 Vaccination for Pregnant Individuals.” Accessed May 1, 2023. https://www.acog.org/news/news-releases/2021/07/acog-smfm-recommend-covid-19-vaccination-for-pregnant-individuals.
[11] 5.3.6 CUMULATIVE ANALYSIS OF POST-AUTHORIZATION ADVERSE EVENT REPORTS OF PF-07302048 (BNT162B2) RECEIVED THROUGH 28-FEB-2021. https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/reissue_5.3.6-postmarketing-experience.pdf