As part of the 1986 Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (The 1986 Act) providing a reliable system to report adverse events after vaccination was part of the law. IF the CDC and the FDA (partners in administering the system) do not think VAERS is reliable (funny they had no issues with VAERS in the past) then they are violating federal law by continuing to use VAERS. Harvard Pilgrim did an in-depth study of VAERS and proved VAERS only reflected less than 1% of all adverse events and only 1-13% of all serious adverse events yet they do have a so called reliable system that the public is not privy to accessing. Harvard Pilgrim offered to assist in creating a better system and their offered was ignored. The CDC and FDA do not want an accurate system. Tracking vaccine adverse events is not rocket science. So why is no one looking into the fact that the CD C and FDA are pretty much admitting they are in violation of the 1986 Act???
Solely because they wish to kill us 'useless eaters".
As part of the 1986 Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (The 1986 Act) providing a reliable system to report adverse events after vaccination was part of the law. IF the CDC and the FDA (partners in administering the system) do not think VAERS is reliable (funny they had no issues with VAERS in the past) then they are violating federal law by continuing to use VAERS. Harvard Pilgrim did an in-depth study of VAERS and proved VAERS only reflected less than 1% of all adverse events and only 1-13% of all serious adverse events yet they do have a so called reliable system that the public is not privy to accessing. Harvard Pilgrim offered to assist in creating a better system and their offered was ignored. The CDC and FDA do not want an accurate system. Tracking vaccine adverse events is not rocket science. So why is no one looking into the fact that the CD C and FDA are pretty much admitting they are in violation of the 1986 Act???