The Covenant with Death Part 5

The “The Covenant with Death” relationship between Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and the American College of Ob-GYN (ACOG)

Part 5 of 5

In Part 1, Part 2, Part 3 and Part 4 we have described the complete and total capture of ACOG as a signatory to “The Covenant of Death”. In this final Part 5 we will conclude this disaster by which ACOG has run amuck, destroyed their own credibility and all semblance of respect with their focus on fascism in lieu of science, gender fluidity, promotion of gender mutilation, adoption of terminology desecrating women such as pregnant people, chest feeding and the rest of the WOKE agenda. ACOG has utterly destroyed the physician patient relationship, abolished the scientific method and broken all four pillars of ethics[1] and honest informed consent as legally mandated by the Nuremberg Code.[2] Documented here is their hell-bent strategy to compromise not only all their constituents, but more importantly wreak global death and injury by their mandated policies that never followed anything remotely resembling science, but instead pure fascism with their pursuit of their own corporate kleptocracy, power and control.

Former HHS Deputy Assistant Secretary Mark Weber

Similar to what former HHS Deputy Assistant Sec. Mark Weber writes about, HHS and CDC seem to be using ACOG to “deliver messages without the Federal government being directly involved (even though the information may come from a Federal source).”[3] Until the FOIA documents were obtained, the CDC’s influential role in ACOG’s COVID-19-related activities and recommendations for pregnant patients was obscured from public view.

More FOIA Documents – COVID-19 Vaccination “Conversations” Between Ob-Gyn Doctors and Their Patients

Of particular interest, the FOIA documents reveal two Cooperative Agreement grants, totaling over $5,000,000 in grant money to ACOG, for a project called “Engaging Women’s Health Care Providers for Effective COVID-19 Vaccine Conversations.”[4] Another separate grant is for a project entitled “Improving Ob/Gyns’ Ability to Support COVID-19 Vaccination, Mental Health, Social Support.”[5] Another perhaps similar project appears to have received grant money in excess of an additional $1 million, funded at the same time – but this project was apparently so controversial that ACOG and HHS/CDC chose to redact it from public view.[6]

While specific details about the program entitled “Engaging Women’s Healthcare Providers for Effective COVID-19 Vaccine Conversations” was redacted, ACOG’s own website might provide a hint about what this project could have entailed. This is because ACOG’s website contains a special “Conversation Guide” page for ob-gyn physicians.

Entitled “COVID-19 Vaccines and Pregnancy: Conversation Guide – Key Recommendations and Messaging for Clinicians,” the page is, by ACOG’s own admission, “intended to help guide [clinicians’] conversations with pregnant patients.”[7] Thanks to this page, there is no need for a ob-gyn to exercise independent medical thought or clinical judgment regarding whether a particular patient should take the COVID-19 shot. Nor is there reason to provide informed consent to the patient about the known and unknown risks of the shots.

Moreover, if the CDC’s “Engaging Women’s Healthcare Providers for Effective COVID-19 Vaccine Conversations” grant is any hint – ACOG’s “Conversation Guide” page may have been drafted in participation with and/or under the purview of the CDC. Key recommendations from ACOG’s “Conversation Guide” page include:

“Vaccination may occur in any trimester, and emphasis should be on vaccine receipt as soon as possible to maximize maternal and fetal health. This recommendation applies to both primary series and booster vaccination.”[8]

“For patients who do not receive any COVID-19 vaccine, the discussion should be documented in the patient’s medical record. During subsequent office visits, obstetrician–gynecologists should address ongoing questions and concerns and offer vaccination again.”[9]

The nutshell version? Urgently push the COVID-19 shots in pregnant patients blindly and repeatedly, without the need for offering informed consent. If you cannot convince the patient to take the COVID-19 “vaccine,” document this discussion in the patient’s electronic medical record for what is likely reporting to the CDC.[10]

ACOG’s “Conversation Guide” webpage also conveniently includes “Key Messages” for its ob-gyn physicians, intended to nullify the need for informed consent and dismiss a pregnant patient’s concerns about safety:

“None of the COVID-19 vaccines available for use under emergency use authorization or U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) license causes infertility or spontaneous abortion.”

“There is no evidence of adverse maternal or fetal effects from vaccinating pregnant individuals with the COVID-19 vaccine, and a growing body of data demonstrates the safety of such use.”[11]

Sources Flash Danger

Yet, multiple sources (which we have written about here), including the government’s own data contained in VAERS,[12] casts doubt on the veracity of these “Key Messages.” At this point in time, continuing to blindly push COVID-19 “vaccination” in pregnancy without informed consent could invite lawsuits brought by any woman who has suffered a complication following the shots, including a complication to her baby.

Most recently, the Defender, a publication which is affiliated with Children’s Health Defense (an organization that advocates for greater vaccine safety founded by Democratic Presidential candidate Robert Kennedy), reports alarming data. Calling into question the veracity of ACOG’s/CDC’s “Key Messages,” the data reported on by the Defender suggest that authorities knew of health risks with the mRNA shots, but assured pregnant mothers it was safe anyway.[13] According to a recent troubling report from Naomi Wolf’s organization, DailyClout, the April 2023 batch of Pfizer clinical documents released under court order demonstrate that both Pfizer and FDA knew the mRNA shots caused serious harm to both fetuses and infants – yet CDC pushed the shots anyway.[14]

More Questions than Answers

ACOG’s July 30, 2021, page recommending the COVID-19 “vaccines” for pregnant individuals does not disclose that ACOG – a membership-driven non-governmental organization – was operating under the purview of the HHS and CDC regarding its COVID-19 guidance for pregnant women at the time that recommendation was made.[15] Which begs multiple questions: When ACOG changed its official COVID-19 “vaccination” position on July 30, 2021 – choosing to follow CDC’s April 23, 2021, recommendations that COVID-19 “vaccines” be given to pregnant women – why didn’t ACOG simply disclose it was following the CDC’s recommendations? Was this July 30, 2021 recommendation also ACOG’s own independent recommendation? If so, what exactly was ACOG’s independent recommendation based upon? Was it based on the CDC’s highly influential but statistically flawed study published April 21, 2021, by CDC Immunization Safety Office Director, Dr. Tom Shimabukuro?[16] In tactics reminiscent of totalitarian societies, in which the totalitarian state pursues an agenda or goal to the exclusion of all others, the landing point here is always the federal government.

Regarding the FOIA documents involving three Cooperative Agreement grants made to ACOG during the pandemic (showing ACOG partnered with and was essentially bound by the CDC regarding its COVID-19 protocols), why weren’t all pages released, providing full transparency? After all, these grants directly impact pregnant women and their unborn children – two of the most vulnerable groups with respect to the COVID-19 shots – and evidence of partnerships between ACOG and the HHS/CDC, administered by US public agencies and supported by tax dollars.

Lastly, if ACOG truly believes (as it states on its “Conversation Guide” page), that there has been “no evidence of adverse maternal or fetal effects from vaccinating pregnant individuals with the COVID-19 vaccine,”[17] then why in the world has it, together with or separately from HHS, invoked “attorney-client,” “work product” and “trade secret” privileges with respect to the redacted FOIA pages? I can’t help but wonder: has ACOG communicated with its 60,000 members to ask their clinical opinions about whether the COVID-19 vaccine should be blindly administered, without informed consent, in any trimester of pregnancy? Has ACOG asked its 60,000 members what they are seeing clinically?

Finally, the fact that ACOG is under the purview of and must comply with the CDC regarding COVID-19 vaccination recommendations in pregnancy is troubling for yet another reason – a potential conflict of interest via the CDC’s nonprofit support entity, the CDC Foundation.[18]

Donation records show that the CDC Foundation has, in past years leading up to the pandemic, received donations from Pfizer, Inc.,[19] the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation,[20] and a host of other pharmaceutical companies and private entities.[21]⁷⁰ Essentially, this puts not only the CDC inside the patient room with you and your ob-gyn while discussing the issue of taking the COVID-19 “vaccination” during pregnancy, but also pharmaceutical manufacturers and others who stand to profit most if you comply.

James A Thorp, MD

---

[1]   Medical Ethics and the Four Pillars of Medical Ethics: 1) Beneficence (doing good), 2) Non-maleficence (to do no harm), 3) Autonomy (giving the patient the freedom t choose freely, where they are able) and 4) Justice (ensuing fairness). https://www.themedicportal.com/application-guide/medical-school-interview/medical-ethics/?v=7516fd43adaa

[2]   Nuremberg Code Establishes The Principle Of Informed Consent. https://www.encyclopedia.com/science/medical-magazines/nuremberg-code-establishes-principle-informed-consent

[3]  See Mark A. Weber, Thomas E. Backer & April Brubach. “Creating the HHS COVID-19 Public Education Media Campaign: Applying Systems Change Learnings.” April 25, 2022. Journal of Health Communication, 27:3, 201-207, DOI: 10.1080/10810730.2022.2067272 (emphasis added).

[4]  Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). 2023. Documents responsive to FOIA Request. 2023. https://centersfordiseasecontrol.sharefile.com/d-sa6cdb04fbfef4f579490cc942fe74945. Accessed May 3, 2023. Page 435-439, 439.

[5]  Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). 2023. Documents responsive to FOIA Request. 2023. https://centersfordiseasecontrol.sharefile.com/d-sa6cdb04fbfef4f579490cc942fe74945. Accessed May 3, 2023. Page 435-439, 439.

[6]   Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). 2023. Documents responsive to FOIA Request. 2023. https://centersfordiseasecontrol.sharefile.com/d-sa6cdb04fbfef4f579490cc942fe74945. Accessed May 3, 2023. Page 439.

[7]   The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG). 2023. “COVID-19 Vaccines and Pregnancy: Conversation Guide – Key Recommendations and Messaging for Clinicians.” Accessed May 1, 2023. https://www.acog.org/covid-19/covid-19-vaccines-and-pregnancy-conversation-guide-for-clinicians.

[8]  The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG). 2023. “COVID-19 Vaccines and Pregnancy: Conversation Guide – Key Recommendations and Messaging for Clinicians.” Accessed May 1, 2023. https://www.acog.org/covid-19/covid-19-vaccines-and-pregnancy-conversation-guide-for-clinicians.

[9]   The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG). 2023. “COVID-19 Vaccines and Pregnancy: Conversation Guide – Key Recommendations and Messaging for Clinicians.” Accessed May 1, 2023. https://www.acog.org/covid-19/covid-19-vaccines-and-pregnancy-conversation-guide-for-clinicians.

[10] Notably, the Cooperative Agreement grant contains a provision stating, “the recipient is expected to provide to CDC copies of and/or access to COVID-19 data collected with these funds.” Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). 2023. Documents responsive to FOIA Request. 2023. https://centersfordiseasecontrol.sharefile.com/d-sa6cdb04fbfef4f579490cc942fe74945. Accessed May 3, 2023. (Pg. 440).

[11] The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG). 2023. “COVID-19 Vaccines and Pregnancy: Conversation Guide – Key Recommendations and Messaging for Clinicians.” Accessed May 1, 2023. https://www.acog.org/covid-19/covid-19-vaccines-and-pregnancy-conversation-guide-for-clinicians.

[12] Thorp, Maggie and Jim Thorp. 2022. “Pushing COVID-19 Shots in Pregnancy: The Greatest Ethical Breach in the History of Medicine.” America Out Loud, February 12, 2023. Accessed May 3, 2023. https://americaoutloud.news/pushing-covid-19-shots-in-pregnancy-the-greatest-ethical-breach-in-the-history-of-medicine/.

[13]  Bell, David, MD. “COVID Vaccines Were Never Sage for Pregnant Women, Pfizer’s Own Data Show.” the Defender: Children’s Health Defense News &Views, April 28, 2023. Accessed May 3, 2023. https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/pfizer-covid-vaccine-pregnancy/.

[14]  Kelly, Amy. “Report 69: Bombshell – Pfizer and FDA Knew in Early 2021 that Pfizer mRNA COVID “Vaccine” Caused Dire Fetal and Infant Risks, Including Death. They Began an Aggressive Campaign to Vaccinate Pregnant Women Anyway.” DailyClout, April 29, 2021. Accessed May 3, 2023. https://dailyclout.io/bombshell-pfizer-and-the-fda-knew-in-early-2021-that-the-pfizer-mrna-covid-vaccine-caused-dire-fetal-and-infant-risks-they-began-an-aggressive-campaign-to-vaccinate-pregnant-women-anyway/.

[15]  The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG). 2023. “ACOG and SMFM Recommend COVID-19 Vaccination for Pregnant Individuals.” Accessed May 1, 2023. https://www.acog.org/news/news-releases/2021/07/acog-smfm-recommend-covid-19-vaccination-for-pregnant-individuals. This page states:

     ACOG encourages its members to enthusiastically recommend vaccination to their patients. This means emphasizing the known safety of the vaccines and the increased risk of severe complications associated with COVID-19 infection, including death, during pregnancy,” said J. Martin Tucker, MD, FACOG, president of ACOG. “It is clear that pregnant people need to feel confident in the decision to choose vaccination, and a strong recommendation from their obstetrician–gynecologist could make a meaningful difference for many pregnant people.” (Emphasis retained).

     See also, The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG). 2023. “COVID-19 Vaccines and Pregnancy: Conversation Guide – Key Recommendations and Messaging for Clinicians.” Accessed May 1, 2023. https://www.acog.org/covid-19/covid-19-vaccines-and-pregnancy-conversation-guide-for-clinicians. This page states:

    The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) strongly recommends that pregnant individuals be vaccinated against COVID-19. Given the potential for severe illness and death during pregnancy, completion of the initial COVID-19 vaccination series is a priority for this population.

[16] Thorp, Maggie and Jim Thorp. 2022. “Pushing COVID-19 Shots in Pregnancy: The Greatest Ethical Breach in the History of Medicine.” America Out Loud, February 12, 2023. Accessed May 3, 2023. https://americaoutloud.news/pushing-covid-19-shots-in-pregnancy-the-greatest-ethical-breach-in-the-history-of-medicine/.

[17]   The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG). 2023. “COVID-19 Vaccines and Pregnancy: Conversation Guide – Key Recommendations and Messaging for Clinicians.” Accessed May 1, 2023. https://www.acog.org/covid-19/covid-19-vaccines-and-pregnancy-conversation-guide-for-clinicians.

[18]   The CDC Foundation. 2023. “Supporting CDC and Public Health.” Accessed May 3, 2023. https://www.cdcfoundation.org/supporting-cdc.

[19]  The CDC Foundation. 2023. “Corporations, Foundations & Organizations: Fiscal year 2018 Report to Contributors.” Accessed May 3, 2023. https://www.cdcfoundation.org/FY2018/organizations. https://www.cdcfoundation.org/FY2018/organizations. (Screen Snapshot captured on June 9, 2019, at 02:46:13, by Internet Archive Wayback Machine. Accessed May 6, 2023).

[20]  The CDC Foundation. 2023. “Corporations, Foundations & Organizations: Fiscal year 2018 Report to Contributors.” Accessed May 3, 2023. https://www.cdcfoundation.org/FY2018/organizations. https://www.cdcfoundation.org/FY2018/organizations. (Screen Snapshot captured on June 9, 2019, at 02:46:13, by Internet Archive Wayback Machine. Accessed May 6, 2023).

[21]  American Society of Hematology. 2023. “CDC Pressed to Acknowledge Industry Funding.” Accessed May 3, 2023. https://ashpublications.org/ashclinicalnews/news/4797/CDC-Pressed-to-Acknowledge-Industry-Funding.